Photo restoration

Restore an old photo with AI — without inventing a new face

The print came out of a drawer: yellow at the edges, a crease across the top right, the faces soft where the paper has been handled. A repair that rebuilds the eyes from nothing hands you a clean picture of somebody else. This one starts from your scan, and it is told what to leave alone.

Two free tries, no account. Credits start when you pick a plan.

2 free tries
Before: a scanned 1998 family print, yellow-brown cast, dust, mould spots and creases across the top rightBefore
After: the same print restored, cast, dust, mould and creases gone, the film grain keptAfter
“Remove the yellow cast, the dust and the creases. Keep the warm light and the grain.”what was typed
A 1998 print scanned at 600 dpi. The cast, the dust and the creases are gone; the grain and the late light stayed where they were.

What this tool can fix (and what it will not invent)

Most bad restorations come from asking one model to do two different jobs: repair the paper, and guess a person. We only promise the first. The split below is the whole policy, so you can decide in ten seconds whether your print belongs here.

01 · It fixes

Colour cast, dust, light scratches, soft scans

The scan is yellow, dull, speckled with dust, a little out of focus. Those are paper problems, and image to image is good at them: the model reads the print, takes out what should not be there and rebuilds the tone underneath.

  • The orange-yellow shift that comes with age
  • Dust, flecks, hairline scratches
  • A scan that lost its contrast in a cheap flatbed
  • A phone photo of a print, shot a few degrees off square
02 · It keeps

Grain, warm light, the face

A restored photo should still look like a photograph. Ask for the grain and the warm cast to stay, and the result reads as a print from that decade instead of a clean render. The face stays because you name it in the sentence, and because the starting point is a picture of that face.

  • Film grain and paper texture
  • The warm light of the room it was taken in
  • The clothes, the hair, the age of both
  • The face, first of all
03 · It will not invent

Missing eyes, torn-away faces, corners that never existed

If a third of the face is gone, no model can restore it. It can only invent — and invention is exactly what makes restored family photos feel wrong: too smooth, too symmetric, three years younger than the last photo of that person. For damage that size, a retoucher painting by hand is the honest answer.

How to restore a photo in three steps

The whole loop is upload, one sentence, compare. Nothing here needs a layers panel.

Step 1

Upload the scan

A flatbed at 300 to 600 dpi beats a phone photo of the print every time. Straighten it before upload, crop out the scanner lid, and send the JPG, PNG or WEBP straight from the folder. Files up to 20 MB go through.

Step 2

Pick a model, write one line

Creative 2.0 when the picture is mostly faces. Seedream 4.5 when the paper texture and the print itself matter. In the prompt, say what changes first and what has to stay second — that order is what keeps the result on the right side of the line.

Step 3

Compare at full zoom, then export

Open the result against the original at 100%, not in a thumbnail. If a face moved, run it again with a different model rather than rewriting the prompt five times. Then export PNG or JPG at 1K on Free, 2K or 4K on a plan.

Which model to pick for family photos

Four models cover almost every print in a drawer. The other eighteen in the studio are for jobs that are not this one.

ModelUse it whenWhat it doesPlan
Creative 2.0The picture is faces, close upHolds the bone structure of a face while it repairs around it, about 11 secondsFree
Seedream 4.5Paper texture, print grain, a 4K fileSharper on fine texture; the 4K pass takes closer to half a minutePro
Nano Banana 2The likeness has to be exactThe most faithful skin and face in the list, and it goes up to 4KPro
Basic 1.0A first look before you spend anythingFaster and blunter. Fine for testing the wording of the promptFree

Free runs come out at 1K with a small watermark. A plan removes it and opens the bigger sizes. The image to image page has the full list of twenty-two if you want to compare them all.

Before and after — same print, clearer file

People judge a restoration from a thumbnail and end up with plastic skin. The two crops below are the pair just above, zoomed into the top right corner where the crease used to be.

Detail before: the top right corner of the print, creases, mould and dust visible at 100%Before, 100%
Detail after: the same corner, creases and mould gone, grain untouchedAfter, 100%

What changed: the cast, the dust, the mould spots, the creases. What stayed: the grain in the shadows, the light coming in from the porch, both faces. If a restoration gets the second list wrong, the first list does not matter.

Four more prints, each damaged a different way

Same loop every time: upload the scan, type one sentence, compare at 100%. The sentence printed under each pair is the brief that was typed, and the only thing that was typed.

Before: a black-and-white studio portrait, foxing spots on the paper and creases at the cornersBefore
After: the same portrait, spots and creases gone, the same face and pearlsAfter

A studio portrait that had foxed in the corners

Brown spots had come through the paper at the edges and both corners had creased. They are gone. The face, the pearls and the grey backdrop are the ones that were there before, which is why the sentence names them.

“Remove the dust, the foxing spots and the crease. Keep the woman exactly as she is: the same face, the same hair, the same pearls, the same dress, the same grey backdrop. Stay black and white.”what was typed
No retouchingone run4:3
Before: a 1970s wedding photograph gone magenta, with scratches across the lower rightBefore
After: the same wedding photograph with the colour back and the scratches goneAfter

A wedding print that had turned pink

Years in a warm room pushed the reds towards magenta and washed the highlights out. The colour came back close to the original, the scratches across the lower right went with it, and the grain stayed.

“Bring back the colour and lose the scratches.”what was typed
No retouchingone run4:3
Before: a 1980s driveway snapshot with a brown water stain across the concreteBefore
After: the same snapshot with the stain gone and the film look keptAfter

A driveway snapshot with a stain over it

Sun fade, dust and a brown stain spreading up from the corner. The stain is gone and the concrete reads as concrete again. The squint and the shine on the bike were never the problem.

“Clean the dust and the water stain. Keep the film look.”what was typed
No retouchingone run4:3
Before: a colour photo of a sedan outside a motel, yellow cast and scratchesBefore
After: the same car and motel with the cast and scratches liftedAfter

A car photo that had gone yellow in an envelope

Colour film, decades in a drawer, and a cast that turned every pale panel olive. The cast and the scratches lifted; the car, the sign and the light did not move. Nothing was redrawn.

“Lift the yellow cast and the scratches. Leave the car alone.”what was typed
No retouchingone run4:3

Optional: colorize a black-and-white scan

Colour is a second job, not a default. Send a black-and-white print and say nothing, and it comes back black and white.

Before: a black-and-white 1951 photograph of a writing desk with letters, an ink bottle, postcards and reading glassesBlack and white
After: the same desk with colour added on request, wood brown and ink blue chosen by the modelColour added
A 1951 desk, colour added on request. The wood and the ink blue are guesses. The handwriting is not.

Ask for it and the model has to choose a plausible skin, a plausible cloth, a plausible wood — that is a different kind of risk from repairing what is already in the frame. Two habits keep it usable.

First, keep the black-and-white file. Run the repair in black and white, export it, then colour a copy, so the version you cannot get back is not the only one you have. Second, for portraits, expect the skin tone to be the part that needs a second pass. A slightly wrong shade of grey in a coat goes unnoticed; a slightly wrong skin tone does not.

“Colourise this photograph gently, keeping the same framing and every object in place. Natural wood, cream paper, dark blue-black ink, thin brass rims on the glasses. Keep the paper tone and the soft contrast.”what was typed

A torn face is a job for a retoucher

We would rather write this here than take your money twice. If the damage is a hole where an eye should be, a missing corner of a face, or a whole person cut out of the frame, restoration becomes invention. The model fills the gap with an average face pulled from everything it has seen, and average is the wrong answer for somebody's father.

A restorer working by hand decides what that face looked like, from other photographs and from what you remember. That is a different trade. Use Scenedo for the paper — the cast, the dust, the scratches, the soft scan — and keep the missing parts for a person.

Questions about restoring family photos

What can AI photo restoration actually fix?

Colour cast, dust, light scratches, and a scan that came out soft or washed out. It works from your file — image to image, not a new portrait — so everything it repairs is built on the pixels you sent.

Will it keep the person's face?

Name the face in the prompt, pick Creative 2.0 or Nano Banana 2, and it usually holds. A heavy rebuild — new light, new decade, half the frame redrawn — can still drift. Compare at 100% before you send the file to anyone.

Can it colorize a black-and-white photo?

Yes, if you ask for it. Left alone, a black-and-white scan comes back black and white. Colour is invented on top of the repair, so keep the uncoloured file as well as the coloured one.

What if a face is torn or missing?

Then it is a retouching job rather than a restoration. A model can fill the gap, but it fills it with an average face, and that is the uncanny part of most "restored" family photos. Use the studio for the paper and a retoucher for the person.

Who owns the restored file? Family photos and copyright.

You keep what you make, under our terms. The part worth checking is the original: a scan of a print you own is usually fine, while a scan of a studio portrait may still belong to the photographer. We do not claim the memory and we do not resell it.

Are my family photos used for training?

No. Uploads are not used to train models and are not passed to third parties for training. Results are kept per plan — 7 days on Free, 12 months on Pro — and you can delete any image from its page.

Do I need an account?

Not for the first two images. Two free tries, no account, no card, and the allowance is one-off rather than daily.

Two free tries, then pick a plan.

Scan one print tonight. No account and no card for the first two images.

Open the studio